[Tagging] The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Wed Jun 13 09:42:01 UTC 2018


2018-06-13 11:36 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com>:

> Obviously - ownership would be recorded in owner tag (rarely done for
> obvious reasons) and
>


what are the obvious reasons not to record if land is owned by the public
or privately owned?



> access in access tag (very rarely done for objects like forests, including
> forests with restricted entry).
>

I think it is not done because people think it is obvious (which might be
true, but only locally / within a given jurisdiction), but it would be
interesting to record it IMHO. E.g. some forests are private, but in
Germany this doesn't imply you cannot enter them. Sometimes, you are
allowed to walk in the forest, sometimes you may do so but only when
keeping on the ways, etc.

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180613/74e6fb90/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list