[Tagging] Unresolved notes

Andrew Harvey andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com
Sun Jun 17 10:48:14 UTC 2018


Agreed, SEO spam and per the consensus in the talk-au thread at
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2018-May/011839.html we
should delete any OSM edits or notes which meet the criteria as spammers
seemingly following the same recipe book without engaging with us.

On 17 June 2018 at 18:39, Michael Reichert <osm-ml at michreichert.de> wrote:

> Hi Graeme,
>
> Am 17.06.2018 um 08:24 schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick:
> > Sorry, copied mixed info
> >
> > This bit should show
> >
> > Others are showing as a note apparently at a location
> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1037676 but then it appears there's
> > nothing there to fix https://www.openstreetmap.
> > org/edit#map=17/-27.96197/153.40334
>
> The note looks like SEO spam but dumped into notes than into map objects
> (nodes and ways). You might try what geocoders of Google and other
> companies return as result for that address. Maybe it is exactly that
> location?
>
> Best regards
>
> Michael
>
> --
> Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschl├╝sselt. (Mailinglisten
> ausgenommen)
> I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180617/5d61392a/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list