[Tagging] tagging bicycle charging stations
André Pirard
A.Pirard.Papou at gmail.com
Thu Jun 28 03:40:01 UTC 2018
On 2018-06-27 16:28, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Mateusz Konieczny
> <matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>> wrote:
>
> I encountered public charging station for electric bicycles.
>
> How this should be tagged?
>
> Currently
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station>
> recommends
>
> amenity=charging_station
> bicycle=yes
> scooter=no
> car=no
> truck=no
>
> what sounds like a horrible idea,
>
>
> I agree. But not for your reasons. Should be charging:bicycle=yes,
> charging:car=no,
> etc.
>
> I propose to use amenity=bicycle_changing_station
> (like there is amenity=bicycle_parking and amenity=parking).
>
>
> And then you encounter a charging station which accommodates both cars and
> bicycles. Which isn't a problem with the existing scheme:
> amenity=charging_station +
> car=yes + bicycle=yes. Which isn't a problemwith a more modern
> version of the existing scheme:
> amenity=charging_station + charging:bicycle=yes + charging:car=yes.
> Which is
> a BIG problem with your idea. Because then you have to use
> amenity=bicycle_charging_station;car_charging_station and which one
> gets rendered (if any)
> is up to the carto.
I remember having been told off by someone who doesn't like namespaces:
"we are not doing like that" ;-)
But you are, like me, perfectly right using it because we could have
charging:bicycle:amperage=* different from charging:car:amperage=*
I had written a general such namespace specification with very strict logic.
But I will never publish it because of comments like above.
People don't agree on the order of the terms in the first place.
All the best,
André.
> Paul
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180628/09b9e392/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list