[Tagging] tagging bicycle charging stations
A.Pirard.Papou at gmail.com
Thu Jun 28 03:40:01 UTC 2018
On 2018-06-27 16:28, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Mateusz Konieczny
> <matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>> wrote:
> I encountered public charging station for electric bicycles.
> How this should be tagged?
> what sounds like a horrible idea,
> I agree. But not for your reasons. Should be charging:bicycle=yes,
> I propose to use amenity=bicycle_changing_station
> (like there is amenity=bicycle_parking and amenity=parking).
> And then you encounter a charging station which accommodates both cars and
> bicycles. Which isn't a problem with the existing scheme:
> amenity=charging_station +
> car=yes + bicycle=yes. Which isn't a problemwith a more modern
> version of the existing scheme:
> amenity=charging_station + charging:bicycle=yes + charging:car=yes.
> Which is
> a BIG problem with your idea. Because then you have to use
> amenity=bicycle_charging_station;car_charging_station and which one
> gets rendered (if any)
> is up to the carto.
I remember having been told off by someone who doesn't like namespaces:
"we are not doing like that" ;-)
But you are, like me, perfectly right using it because we could have
charging:bicycle:amperage=* different from charging:car:amperage=*
I had written a general such namespace specification with very strict logic.
But I will never publish it because of comments like above.
People don't agree on the order of the terms in the first place.
All the best,
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging