[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop
okosm at johnfreed.com
Fri May 4 20:34:41 UTC 2018
PLEASE do NOT create a highway=walking_bus tag! This would be useful for
the Public Transport v1 scheme. Which hopefully will some year go away.
Please DO follow Thorsten's suggestion and follow PTv2, mapping the stops
as nodes alongside the street/way (not on it) in the proper direction. Tag
If you don't know the side of the street (or it's irrelevant), you can
place the node in the street (as part of the way) and tag it with:
I see that the route relation was discussed here in October 2016. If you
feel ambitious, you can go a step further and create route relations as
described under PTv2 using:
... and even create route_master relations:
In any case, please do not create a new highway tag. In hindsight those
were not the best way to go, but there are a million of them (for buses) so
they're not going away anytime soon.
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 5:21 PM, <osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote:
> You’ll probably also need a type of route relation for this?
> Also, public_transport=platform is only valid with at least one transport
> type specific tag, e.g. bus=yes or tram=yes. So there should probably be a
> walkingbus=yes or walking_bus=yes tag on that. (Whichever is chosen, it
> should be the same string that’s used for the route relation).
> *From:* Lorenzo Stucchi <lorenzo.stucchi at mail.polimi.it>
> *Sent:* Friday, 4 May 2018 19:22
> *To:* tagging at openstreetmap.org
> *Subject:* [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop
> I saw that there is a specific tag for the walking bus stop, so this is
> mine propose about how to tag them. What do you think about this purpose?
> Def: Stop point of walking school bus
> Thank you,
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging