[Tagging] access=disabled

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri May 11 00:45:10 UTC 2018


What I have for now :

Disabled Parking - Way: 587061339
   Tags:
     "access"="disabled"
     "surface"="paved"
     "amenity"="parking"
     "capacity:disabled"="3"
     "description"="Disabled Parking"
     "source"="survey"
     "capacity"="3"

Ambulance Parking - Way: 584778386
   Tags:
     "access"="emergency"
     "capacity:emergency"="3"
     "surface"="paved"
     "amenity"="parking"
     "description"="Ambulance Only"
     "source"="LPI Imagery + knowledge"
     "capacity"="3"

15 min parking Way: 584778387
   Tags:
     "maxstay"=".25"
     "source"="LPI Imagery + knowledge"
     "surface"="paved"
     "amenity"="parking"

Not certain of the 15 minute parking capacity .. would need to look .. 
too much of a hurry when I have been there to note the capacity. Left by 
a different way.

On 10/05/18 13:04, Johnparis wrote:
> If it's exclusive the normal tagging would be:
>
> access=no
> disabled=yes
>
> ...to be consistent with other such, like
> access=no
> bus=yes
>
> Though I would argue that they all should use the access: prefix in 
> this case
>
> access=no
> access:disabled=yes
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2018, 02:51 Andrew Davidson <theswavu at gmail.com 
> <mailto:theswavu at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On 10/5/18 10:34, Warin wrote:
>     >
>     > and then the consumer would need to test it for exclusivity.
>     >
>
>     That does appear to be the logic applied.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180511/62995616/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list