[Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes

Marc Gemis marc.gemis at gmail.com
Fri May 11 08:09:23 UTC 2018


It will probably depend on traffic code/law in each country.
According to wikipedia [1] it's normally between 2.5 and 3.5 m
AFAIK when a lane is smaller, and thus not suitable for trucks and
cars with caravans, it has to be indicated by a traffic sign.
For me full width means that a car (which has to be smaller than 2 m,
not ?) can drive over it, without blocking cars in other lanes.


[1] https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rijstrook

p.s. this discussion should have been taking to a different thread, as
we are now hijacking the OP's tread on "tagging of one-way cycle
lanes".

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
<dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 11. May 2018, at 06:44, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> When the "lanes" tag was introduced the community choose to only count the "full width segments for motorised traffic".
>
>
> what is the definition for “full width”? Is a road with 1,8 width lanes=0? width=2.4? Given that maximum vehicle width is 2,50 it would seem sane to assume full width to be at least 3,00 m.
>
> Ciao, Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



More information about the Tagging mailing list