[Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes

[osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au]

I would tag that as:

 

oneway=yes

lanes=3

lanes:psv=1

vehicle:lanes=yes|yes|no

psv:lanes=yes|yes|designated 

parking:lane:left=parallel

parking:condition:left=ticket

sidewalk=both

 

This sign clearly defines how many lanes there are and that it’s a psv lane (not just a bus lane):

 

https://www.google.com.au/maps/@41.8976885,12.4654864,3a,17.5y,4.9h,90.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPA9cA6SFCm4EvIHqGgo--Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

 

The road markings near the intersection also make it clear how many lanes there are :

 

https://www.google.com.au/maps/@41.8994254,12.4643407,3a,66.8y,356.59h,86.38t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sOEpzRTQFWoZi-4BndvycFg!2e0

 

(the leftmost lane here was the parking lane, which is not included in lanes=x)

 

The parking tags probably need some more information, but I can’t read the signs on streetview, so that’s a job for a field survey.

 

From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> 
Sent: Friday, 11 May 2018 20:46
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes

 

I would also find it misleading to tag situations with lanes=2 where there is a painted bus lane and the rest of the carriageway (wide enough for 2-3 lanes) has no separations, like here:
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@41.8987442,12.4647371,3a,75y,156.28h,56.34t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWEPSOplLQldMLooamvppkQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656



Cheers,

Martin



OT: 

these are obviously not representative pictures of the road as they have probably been taken in the hottest period when everyone had left the city for a few days,

usual conditions are like this https://static.fanpage.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/04/traffico-roma3-300x225.jpg

and in case of problems something like this https://www.ilmessaggero.it/photos/HIGH/83/38/2098338_trafficoroma.jpg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180511/7d92495e/attachment-0001.html>