[Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes
voschix at gmail.com
Sun May 13 17:04:06 UTC 2018
May I kindly ask my fellow mappers to come back to my initial question
about tagging of oneway cycle lanes? I would like to get an amswer without
changing the existing tagging schemes for lanes.
Thanks in advance
On 13 May 2018 at 16:30, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2018, 00:37 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> For your first image lanes=0, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=1.
> This literally doesn't add up. Also, that's a shoulder on the right, Tulsa
> screwed up and used white paint for the centerline.
> Awkward but correct. But as said before, the lanes tag is pretty useless
>> beside some simple, straightforward street layouts, for even number of
>> total lanes evenly divided in both directions. Lanes=3 is useless, not?
> No! That tag makes it easy to find a tagging error further down. There's
> a good reason validators choke when the forward, backward and both_ways
> lanes don't total the lane count. Editors set this automatically,
> validators throw errors for on this because that idea is brick to the head,
> physically induced brain trauma, short-bus riding special.
> So once again, define a new tag or do not use the lanes tag, or use it
>> as it is defined now. Do not change its meaning.
> I'm not, the wiki is.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging