[Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes

Volker Schmidt voschix at gmail.com
Sun May 13 17:04:06 UTC 2018


May I kindly ask my fellow mappers to come back to my initial question
about tagging of oneway cycle lanes? I would like to get an amswer without
changing the existing tagging schemes for lanes.

Thanks in advance


On 13 May 2018 at 16:30, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2018, 00:37 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> For your first image lanes=0, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=1.
>>
>
> This literally doesn't add up. Also, that's a shoulder on the right, Tulsa
> screwed up and used white paint for the centerline.
>
> Awkward but correct.  But as said before,  the lanes tag is pretty useless
>> beside some simple,  straightforward street layouts,  for even number of
>> total lanes evenly divided in both directions.  Lanes=3 is useless,  not?
>>
>
> No!  That tag makes it easy to find a tagging error further down.  There's
> a good reason validators choke when the forward, backward and both_ways
> lanes don't total the lane count.  Editors set this automatically,
> validators throw errors for on this because that idea is brick to the head,
> physically induced brain trauma, short-bus riding special.
>
> So once again,  define a new tag or do not use the lanes tag,  or use it
>> as it is defined now.  Do not change its meaning.
>>
>
> I'm not, the wiki is.
>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180513/5917833b/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list