[Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Sun May 13 14:30:06 UTC 2018


On Sun, May 13, 2018, 00:37 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:

> For your first image lanes=0, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=1.
>

This literally doesn't add up. Also, that's a shoulder on the right, Tulsa
screwed up and used white paint for the centerline.

Awkward but correct.  But as said before,  the lanes tag is pretty useless
> beside some simple,  straightforward street layouts,  for even number of
> total lanes evenly divided in both directions.  Lanes=3 is useless,  not?
>

No!  That tag makes it easy to find a tagging error further down.  There's
a good reason validators choke when the forward, backward and both_ways
lanes don't total the lane count.  Editors set this automatically,
validators throw errors for on this because that idea is brick to the head,
physically induced brain trauma, short-bus riding special.

So once again,  define a new tag or do not use the lanes tag,  or use it as
> it is defined now.  Do not change its meaning.
>

I'm not, the wiki is.

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180513/37f46263/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list