[Tagging] tagging arbiters (gone OT)
davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
Sun May 20 21:09:24 UTC 2018
The case I had in mind was Carto-OSM's claim to require the highest
level boundary admin_level tag to be on ways & within relations.
I'm unsure I'd describe it as a bug, as they haven't written any code
for it yet.
Those involved claim this is not possible within Carto-OSM:
Read the discussion here:
On 19/05/2018 03:12, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Dave F <davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
> <mailto:davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com>> wrote:
> On 13/05/2018 22:34, Kevin Kenny wrote:
>> I've long said that the final arbiters of tagging should be...
>> the people who implement the routers, renderers, navigation
>> systems,. search engines, and so on
> We already have the case where Carto-OSM are requesting duplicated
> tags on ways that are already in relations as they're
> unwilling/unable to right code that manipulates relation data.
> Is that a bug in the carto-osm github right now? Even the Linux
> kernel killed the ext filesystem dinosaur once ext4 became a thing,
> and by then it already overstayed it's welcome once ext2 was
> widespread. Killing the route-refs-on-ways dinosaur is long overdue.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging