[Tagging] new role for route relations: reverse
okosm at johnfreed.com
Mon May 28 17:33:58 UTC 2018
Replying specifically to this point:
*Sure, renderers and routers might cope with the bus going to point X and
*switching its direction of travel by 180 degrees but it's a bit puzzling
for dataconsumers. Does the bus go out of service there? Is it a
terminus? Has the mapper*
*made a big mistake in the route? Did some other mapper come along
andaccidentally delete part of the route? Etc.*
I have mapped a fairly significant number of routes where exactly that
happens. The bus enters a way and exits the way, traversing it twice. It
seems to me to be nothing out of the ordinary.
But if this might really be a problem for consumers, you could add a
description=* tag to the way rather than the note=* that I suggested. If
this is the main reason for the proposed role, I would not be in favor of
it. The second traversal is not really "reverse" in any sense. The
traverses the way forward (south to north, say) the first time and the
other direction (north to south) the second time. The traversals are
consecutive. Totally normal in my view.
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Erkin Alp Güney <erkinalp9035 at gmail.com>
>> Does it have any stops in the street it reverses into?
> Not that I've seen. But if somebody asked to get off there I'm fairly
> sure that most of the
> drivers would permit it. And since it backs as far as a bench, I'm also
> fairly sure most
> drivers would let somebody sat on the bench waiting for the bus to board
>> If not, it is not formally a part of the route and just a convention.
> Yes, but without it the route involves a role called "magic_turntable."
> If this were an end of route turnaround at a terminus then it's not
> mappable. What
> happens when passengers are not on board and the bus is technically out of
> are not part of the route. But this is done with passengers on board in
> the middle of
> the route.
> Sure, renderers and routers might cope with the bus going to point X and
> switching its direction of travel by 180 degrees but it's a bit puzzling
> for data
> consumers. Does the bus go out of service there? Is it a terminus? Has
> the mapper
> made a big mistake in the route? Did some other mapper come along and
> accidentally delete part of the route? Etc.
> Unless having role=reverse is going to cause big problems for renderers or
> routers I don't see any problem with having it. I doubt it's going to get
> often, so it's not a problem regarding data storage. But I could be wrong.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging