[Tagging] RFC proposed water property key 'ephemeral '

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed May 30 11:55:13 UTC 2018


30. May 2018 00:31 by 61sundowner at gmail.com <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>:


> In that case I would tag
>     
>     intermittent=summer 
>     

 


(...)
    

 

> The tags should 'make sense' without requiring further explanation    ... as that generates these kind of problems. 







I strongly oppose bolting on additional unclear values to tag where 99.99% values are yes/no.




See https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/intermittent#values <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/intermittent#values> 98.68% for yes, 1.31% for no,

all other values together 0.01%.




Especially as intermittent=summer may easily mean:




"intermittent during summer, water present otherwise"

"intermittent during summer, no water otherwise"




Intermittent is nice, clean tag without overly complicated syntax and it should stay this way.



One may easily invent new tags to properly tag such detail.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180530/9a415d69/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list