[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

[Allan Mustard]

How about amenity=embassy, amenity=consulate, plus
amenity=representation to capture those facilities that are neither
pudding nor frozen, er, sorry, neither embassies nor consulates?  Any
heartburn there?  Then we use diplomatic=* as an additional tag (i.e.,
continue current practice) to specify different flavors, er, types of
diplomatic/consular mission?  Should I modify the proposed feature to that?

apm-wa


On 11/1/2018 2:00 PM, Johnparis wrote:
> OK, I take back what I said. And if Allan, Markus and Martin all think
> that's the way to go, I'm fine with that.
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:46 AM SelfishSeahorse
> <selfishseahorse at gmail.com <mailto:selfishseahorse at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 09:41, Martin Koppenhoefer
>     <dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >
>     > > I haven't seen anyone (recently) who supports your original
>     proposal of keeping amenity=embassy and adding amenity=consulate.
>     So I believe your first summary is inaccurate.
>     >
>     > I do. For me this is most consistent with the rest of the
>     system, requires the least modifications and I don’t see why it
>     shouldn’t work.
>
>     +1
>
>     Regards
>     Markus
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181101/97df0c7e/attachment.html>