[Tagging] Estimated values for height

Sergio Manzi smz at smz.it
Tue Nov 13 15:07:42 UTC 2018

Yeah, agreed. And I think in our context "/estimate/" should be more taken as "/quesstimate/", i.e. "/a first rough approximation pending a more accurate estimate, or it may be an educated guess at something for which no better information will become available/" [1].

Now... how do we tag this... "/thing/"?  :-)

My personal idea is that it should be:


    /measure/:accuracy=estimate (e.g.: height=10 + "height:accuracy=estimate")


    accuracy:/measure/=estimate (e.g.: height=10 + "accuracy:height=estimate")


    get rid of all the est_* tags (e.g.: est_height=10)



[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guesstimate

On 2018-11-13 15:47, OSMDoudou wrote:
> In hopefully simple words, an estimate would be a measure which doesn't meet your precision need or doesn't meet your trust criteria of the measure or of the measuring person.
> So, they way it was measured is factual information the mapper should share, so that the data consumer can determine for itself if it's good enough for him.
> Without telling how it was measured, one cannot assess accuracy. And "site survey" wouldn't be a good explanation because it says nothing about the accuracy of the tool used nor about the qualification of the measuring person to use the tool adequately.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181113/7657aa7f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3675 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181113/7657aa7f/attachment.bin>

More information about the Tagging mailing list