[Tagging] Suggestion: ref:mobile_payment for amenity=parking

Paul Allen pla16021 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 21 15:33:25 UTC 2018

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 3:21 PM marc marc <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Le 21. 11. 18 à 13:39, Michael Brandtner a écrit :
> > it's a ref specific to this parking lot to be entered into an app or sms.
> payment:sms=yes or payment:sms=<the number to send the sms to>
> payment:<appname>=yes
> > ref:payment:app=12345
> > ref:payment:sms=12345
> ref=12345 look enough, isn't it ?

No.  Not if it's pay-by-app instead of pay-by-sms.  Not if it's pay-by-bonk
(NFC).  Etc.  Any of those might
be possible.  More to the point, ALL of them might be possible, each
requiring a different code.

No.  Not if ref has other possible meanings.  Such as the operator's
reference to that particular
car park (or whatever) but NOT the number to put in an SMS.  Etc.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181121/597af739/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list