[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boundary=aboriginal_lands
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Thu Nov 29 09:40:00 UTC 2018
sent from a phone
> On 28. Nov 2018, at 02:54, Doug Hembry <doughembry at hotmail.com> wrote:
> if this is "policy", does it mean that
> boundary=protected_area, and protect_class=* tags are doomed in OSM?
> Have we found the covert reason why carto still doesn't render it,
> despite the fact that it could be rendered (at least initially) exactly
> like boundary=national_park?
to make sense of boundary=protected area, one has to look at the protect_class, which wasn’t possible in carto until recently (hstore). It is not an option to render all protected areas as nature protected areas, that would be highly misleading in many occasions.
More information about the Tagging