viking81 at tin.it
Mon Oct 1 21:29:38 UTC 2018
>Nice to see you back there :)
>Regarding check_date, I'd go in favor of operational_status:date.
>working:* is too specific to fully functional hydrants, what about disused or dry ones?
>Then operational_status is a more complete solution to give state and associated date.
>All the best
Nice to see you too, Francois :)
Well I proposed working_test:date only because it is already in use for hydrants.
On the other hand, operational_status is used more often, although operational_status:date has only 1 occurence.
Shall we go on discussion page ? Even Marc preferred operational status, as reported on .
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
More information about the Tagging