phil at trigpoint.me.uk
Tue Oct 2 18:01:12 UTC 2018
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 23:29 +0200, Viking wrote:
> > Hi Alberto,
> > Nice to see you back there :)
> > Regarding check_date, I'd go in favor of operational_status:date.
> > working:* is too specific to fully functional hydrants, what about
> > disused or dry ones?
> > Then operational_status is a more complete solution to give state
> > and associated date.
> > All the best
> > François
> Nice to see you too, Francois :)
> Well I proposed working_test:date only because it is already in use
> for hydrants.
> On the other hand, operational_status is used more often, although
> operational_status:date has only 1 occurence.
> Shall we go on discussion page ? Even Marc preferred operational
> status, as reported on .
How would we verify check date, surely that is a record kept by the
More information about the Tagging