[Tagging] My "weirdly unnatural aversion to relations"

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Oct 2 10:00:15 UTC 2018


2. Oct 2018 05:15 by baloo at ursamundi.org <mailto:baloo at ursamundi.org>:


>>
>>
>>
>>  - this data is basically not usable. 
>>
> Sure it is.  Say I want to know what amenities an RV park has in another city...you could go  "hey, what does Somewhereville RV Park have?" or just throw Somewhereville RV Park and get a list of everything that belongs to the same site.  Dump station, fuel pump, convenience store, information stand, mailboxes, laundry, showers, toilets...regardless of whether or not these things are named or not, or even share the same name as the RV park itself.  Like, say, "Old Faceful Geyser" (actually a splashpad) in the "Jellystone Park" RV park at Lake Eufaula (to use something I might try if I was taking my boyfriend and niece truck camping and wasn't actually familiar with this being a delightfully furry, yet corny, and relatively comfortable for cheap truck-tent camping).

 
I am not sure how it requires a site relation. Mapping feature as a polygon is sufficient tomark objects inside this polygon as, well, inside the polygon.
In rare cases of holes/disjointed areas multipolygon is needed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181002/a5a72166/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list