[Tagging] mast / tower / communication_tower (again)

François Lacombe fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com
Mon Oct 8 23:01:06 UTC 2018


Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 à 00:51, marc marc <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com> a écrit :

> Le 09. 10. 18 à 00:32, Graeme Fitzpatrick a écrit :
> > man_made=tower: a tall, slim, freestanding vertical structure
> > with internal access
>
> if it matches the look, isn't that what would already be
> described by the undocumented building=tower ?
>

Hard to tag a free-standing lattice tower as a building, don't you?
http://lupo-bg.eu/en/projects/92/921.jpg


> > create a new tower:type=multipurpose
> tower:type=value1;value2 is not enough ?
>

tower:type shouldn't be confused with usage=* or any specific key to
indicate the purpose of the tower.
It's bad to merge several inconsistent concept in one key.


>
> > man-made=pole
>
> so all support=pole and man-made=pole need
> to be double tagged with the other namespace
> or you see a difference between both ?
>

support=pole should be understood in a passive meaning : the tagged feature
is supported on a pole
man_made=pole is an actual pole

All the best

François
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181009/120c79bb/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list