[Tagging] mast / tower / communication_tower (again)

Graeme Fitzpatrick graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 8 23:27:00 UTC 2018

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 08:51, marc marc <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com> wrote:

> I agree in principle, but I have a few questions.
> Le 09. 10. 18 à 00:32, Graeme Fitzpatrick a écrit :
> > man_made=tower: a tall, slim, freestanding vertical structure
> > with internal access
> if it matches the look, isn't that what would already be
> described by the undocumented building=tower ?

As Francois says, a lattice tower is not a building. & "undocumented" is
also a bit of a problem! I didn't even know such a tag existed & it's not
listed on the map features page

> create a new tower:type=multipurpose
> tower:type=value1;value2 is not enough ?

Could be, but currently man_made:communications_tower renders one way,
tower:type=communications & second way & tower:type=observation a different
way again. If you combine communications;observation, which would it render

so all support=pole and man-made=pole need
> to be double tagged with the other namespace
> or you see a difference between both ?

Another one that I didn't know of the existence of. The only reference I
could find to pole was power=pole purely for supporting electrical cables.
Somebody else, earlier in this discussion, also made reference to
man_made=pole being undocumented but used for roof-top mobile phone antennae


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181009/e7474f2a/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list