[Tagging] issues with the list of deprecated features

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Oct 15 10:27:47 UTC 2018

Am Mo., 15. Okt. 2018 um 12:20 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <
matkoniecz at tutanota.com>:

> 15. Oct 2018 10:57 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:
> 1. amenity=artwork
> Yes, tourism=artwork is the established tagging, but it has issues:
> artwork has nothing at all to do with tourism
> As I understand you - in your opinion it would be preferable to end with
> amenity=artwork as a
> preferred tagging.


> I am not sure how it changes that we ended with tourism-artwork as a
> standard.
> Also, "has nothing at all" is not true. Artworks are quite likely to be a
> tourism attractions.

following this argument, we would have to tag the national parliaments as
tourism=parliament because they are quite likely tourism attractions.

> 2. amenity=car_repair
> For businesses offering car repair, this isn't the right tag (shop is),
> but it doesn't mean there can't be an amenity=car_repair for place where
> you can repair your car.
> Feel free to add that deprecation applies to businesses.
> Though most of amenity=car_repair would be still businesses offering car
> repair, if you want to tag something like that it would be preferable to
> find a new tag.

agree, this was one of the less questionable deprecations.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181015/40711a62/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list