[Tagging] issues with the list of deprecated features
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Oct 15 16:42:42 UTC 2018
Am Mo., 15. Okt. 2018 um 13:55 Uhr schrieb Lionel Giard <
lionel.giard at gmail.com>:
> For tourism=* tag, for me, it is just a method to not tag each artwork
> with "tourism=attraction" i would suppose (as they are probably all an
> attraction), while a parliament *could *be a tourism=attraction, while
> another part of it (or another parliament building) is of no particular
> touristic value !
I am pretty sure it is the opposite way: all parliaments (or almost) are
tourist attractions, but most public art isn't. Just a few examples of
things that can undoubtfully (I think?) be considered artwork, and are
clearly no tourist attractions. And these are even sculptures set up by the
government at prominent places, not graffiti informally applied under dark
bridges or something like this.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging