[Tagging] unmarked crossing, tactile paving, lowered kerbs / was: 2 meaning for crossing=zebra
graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 26 22:14:23 UTC 2018
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 01:01, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfeifer at computer.org> wrote:
> On 26.10.2018 16:41, Robert Skedgell wrote:
> > On 26/10/18 11:44, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> >> Tagging "unmarked crossings" does not make sense for me. An unmarked
> >> crossing is defined in OSM by a road and a footway sharing a node, there
> >> is no need for a tag here, as there is nothing special.
> > An unmarked crossing may have no road markings or signs, but if there is
> > tactile paving and/or a raised/lowered/flush kerb on the footway
> > (sidewalk), how else would one tag it?
So how would you tag this situation:
There is a footpath along the side of the road, which drops to road level
via a lowered kerb, to meet up with another lowered kerb on the other side
of the road. There are no signs or markings of any sort.
I map them as crossing=unmarked
Any other suggestions?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging