[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
Sat Oct 27 16:20:06 UTC 2018


Hi,

On 27.10.2018 11:57, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
> Tagging something as office=diplomatic then diplomatic=non-diplomatic
> sounds silly and oxymoronic. Why not simply diplomatic=other? Also we
> should allow diplomatic=yes if the mapper doesn't know the exact type.
> Therefore diplomatic=[embassy, consulate, other, yes].

Would "yes" not be implied already by office=diplomatic? If someone
wasn't sure they could just use office=diplomatic without diplomatic=*.

(Side note, I've seen diplomatic offices that were so cordoned off by
local security forces that you wouldn't even come close enough to
determine whether this is a government facility or a diplomatic one. Of
course you can always ask the guards but maybe that only makes you
suspicious ;)

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"



More information about the Tagging mailing list