[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)
frederik at remote.org
Sat Oct 27 16:20:06 UTC 2018
On 27.10.2018 11:57, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
> Tagging something as office=diplomatic then diplomatic=non-diplomatic
> sounds silly and oxymoronic. Why not simply diplomatic=other? Also we
> should allow diplomatic=yes if the mapper doesn't know the exact type.
> Therefore diplomatic=[embassy, consulate, other, yes].
Would "yes" not be implied already by office=diplomatic? If someone
wasn't sure they could just use office=diplomatic without diplomatic=*.
(Side note, I've seen diplomatic offices that were so cordoned off by
local security forces that you wouldn't even come close enough to
determine whether this is a government facility or a diplomatic one. Of
course you can always ask the guards but maybe that only makes you
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the Tagging