[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)
allan at mustard.net
Sat Oct 27 16:41:54 UTC 2018
I agree. Keep it to three: [embassy, consulate, other]. If the mapper
doesn't know, he can check the Ministry of Foreign Affairs website. The
information will typically be there.
On 10/27/2018 9:20 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> On 27.10.2018 11:57, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
>> Tagging something as office=diplomatic then diplomatic=non-diplomatic
>> sounds silly and oxymoronic. Why not simply diplomatic=other? Also we
>> should allow diplomatic=yes if the mapper doesn't know the exact type.
>> Therefore diplomatic=[embassy, consulate, other, yes].
> Would "yes" not be implied already by office=diplomatic? If someone
> wasn't sure they could just use office=diplomatic without diplomatic=*.
> (Side note, I've seen diplomatic offices that were so cordoned off by
> local security forces that you wouldn't even come close enough to
> determine whether this is a government facility or a diplomatic one. Of
> course you can always ask the guards but maybe that only makes you
> suspicious ;)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging