[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

Allan Mustard allan at mustard.net
Sat Oct 27 16:41:54 UTC 2018


I agree.  Keep it to three: [embassy, consulate, other].  If the mapper
doesn't know, he can check the Ministry of Foreign Affairs website.  The
information will typically be there.

apm-wa


On 10/27/2018 9:20 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27.10.2018 11:57, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
>> Tagging something as office=diplomatic then diplomatic=non-diplomatic
>> sounds silly and oxymoronic. Why not simply diplomatic=other? Also we
>> should allow diplomatic=yes if the mapper doesn't know the exact type.
>> Therefore diplomatic=[embassy, consulate, other, yes].
> Would "yes" not be implied already by office=diplomatic? If someone
> wasn't sure they could just use office=diplomatic without diplomatic=*.
>
> (Side note, I've seen diplomatic offices that were so cordoned off by
> local security forces that you wouldn't even come close enough to
> determine whether this is a government facility or a diplomatic one. Of
> course you can always ask the guards but maybe that only makes you
> suspicious ;)
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181027/5273f065/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list