[Tagging] Tagging suggestions for electricity

[Warin]

On 03/09/18 02:22, Dolly Andriatsiferana wrote:
>
>     But if your going to use it ..please document it on the OSM wiki
>     so people can find what it means.
>
> Just one question though: for the wiki page of this do I put "draft" 
> or "proposed" or "de facto" or "in use" for the status?

I would not put a status on it.

It is not a draft, proposed nor approved.
It has no use at the moment, and it is certainly not de facto.

So I'd leave the status off.
Do include the tagifo information so people can see the use - that will 
give them more information than the status statement anyway.

>
>
>
> 2018-09-02 18:20 GMT+03:00 Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com 
> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>:
>
>     On 03/09/18 01:08, Dolly Andriatsiferana wrote:
>>     To make it simple, for our ongoing mapping project we're going to
>>     use the
>>     *electricity=yes/no/grid/solar/generator/whatever_the_source_is* system
>>
>
>     I don't like it. But I'm not using it anyway.
>     But if your going to use it ..please document it on the OSM wiki
>     so people can find what it means.
>
>>     and omit any specific detail such as standard, current or
>>     grounding system to avoid possible conflicting tagging
>
>     Good decision.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180903/6fb0d0f9/attachment.html>