[Tagging] Is waterway=riverbank an 'Old scheme' ?

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 7. Sep 2018, at 15:51, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The idea that  waterway=* must be routable is, frankly, a new one to
> me.  How is a mapper supposed to tag a non-navigable river?


and which vessel should you choose for cruising in a ditch? There are definitions for waterways which require they are navigable, but not in OSM.



cheers,
Martin