[Tagging] Designated value as a key

[Lionel Giard]

I'm not seeing much difference seeing "designated=bicycle" versus the
in-use combinaison "bicycle=designated" (same for the other common tag like
motor_vehicle) except that the first one would use a different "access
paradigm" than everything else. That's not really a simplification to me,
and i don't understand the reason that you would use that. Is there really
a big problem in the processing of such access tag by software ?

For the very specific employee access, why is it better to use the
"designated subtag" instead of using a "private=Repsol workers" subtag ? As
most employees-only access are tagged via access=private.

Le dim. 9 sept. 2018 à 12:46, Philip Barnes <phil at trigpoint.me.uk> a écrit :

> Local bus is already covered by the psv tag, public service vehicle.
>
> I assume by schoolar you mean scholar? I would consider scholar an
> outdated term, something my grandparents used to say. It is more common to
> refer to students in modern English, which I believe is what you have in
> Spanish?
>
> Phil (trigpoint)
>
> On 9 September 2018 10:08:42 CEST, yo paseopor <yopaseopor at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> When I tag the access to a way reading the meaning of the traffic sign I
>> miss some specific conditions. I know I can do it at general times with key
>> access, but in specific cases access is so "small for me". There are also
>> conditional tags but with these two keys I don't arrive to cover local
>> meanings and situations of restriction to some vehicles (example, you have
>> a living street, which is only allowed for the LOCAL bus line, nor the
>> other buses. So you can't tag it with bus=yes or bus=designated within the
>> complete meaning of the restriction given you by the traffic sign.
>>
>> For these situations I propose to "flip" designated value and convert it
>> to a subkey. In that way you would have an escalable subkey that you can
>> complete with the specific information of that tag. This key will be
>> together with the combination access=designated so you can complete the
>> information of the specific designation
>>
>> access=designated
>> designated=local_bus
>>
>> designated=bicycle
>> designated=motor_vehicle
>> designated=pedestrian
>> designated=Mo-Fr 9:00-9:30
>> designated:en=schoolars only
>> designated:ca=Només escoles
>> designated:es=Solo escuelas
>>
>> This also applies for other uses like some restrictions done by "marks"
>> (Example: in a industrial zone you have some private ways...but private of
>> who? In the reality you will have a traffic sign it says you who can pass
>> or who cannot)
>> With normal access scheme you would say...repsol_workers=yes but Would it
>> better if I can specify the "specific designation" ?
>>
>> access=designated
>> designated=Repsol workers
>>
>>
>> hey! but you have access tags yes/no to do that! ...And the software has
>> to guess which of the 32 keys with yes=no is for access . For general
>> purposes it's ok. But for an specific case the software can read this
>> designated value.
>>
>> What do you think?
>> Salut i accessos designats (Health and designated access)
>> yopaseopor
>>
>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180909/5fc2c312/attachment.html>