[Tagging] Is waterway=riverbank an 'Old scheme' ?

[Dave F]

Ideally, yes. However I'm aware that with waterway=riverbank there's 
nothing inherently wrong, as there was with old style multipolygons*. 
It's just that the alternative are a better option.

* This campaign was only half completed. There are still many examples 
where tags are on outer ways. I plan on writing about it soon.

DaveF

On 07/09/2018 23:00, Andrew Hain wrote:
> Would you favour a campaign like the one to update old style 
> multipolygons then?
>
> --
> Andrew
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Dave F <davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com>
> *Sent:* 06 September 2018 19:04:23
> *To:* tagging at openstreetmap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] Is waterway=riverbank an 'Old scheme' ?
> Clarifying:
>
> natural=water, water=river fits in with all other bodies of water mapped
> as polygons.
>
> Cheers
> DaveF
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180909/9ab59f85/attachment.html>