[Tagging] maxspeed:type vs source:maxspeed // StreetComplete
djakk.djakk at gmail.com
Wed Sep 19 15:20:53 UTC 2018
Yes Paul, I should not forget the beginners ...
I am not a beginner anymore but I still found “source:maxspeed=“ for roads
a little confusing, as we should use “source=“ only (?) on the metadata (on
Anyway, for a beginner : is one key even better ? -> should we allow
“maxspeed=no_sign” ? Or/and “maxspeed=default” ?
Le mer. 19 sept. 2018 à 16:28, Jérôme Seigneuret <
jerome.seigneuret at gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi, tagging list
> I just join it.
> For your information there is part of proposed tagging schema in french
> subject discuss with @djakk.djakk at gmail.com <djakk.djakk at gmail.com>
> Values of legal type can be thinking in specific territory area and
> resolve "in my opinion" lot of case and subject in relation to access,
> maxspeed, and legal dimension. the last term is "the case" of lot of
> problem of tagging because it can't be appreciated just with maxspeed and
> access definition.
> All cases will be deliberate. Speak with law school faculty or a lawyer
> can help us to see all cases.
> Le mer. 19 sept. 2018 à 15:57, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> a
> écrit :
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 08:27 djakk djakk <djakk.djakk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> By the way, we should de-correlate the legal status of an highway from
>>> the highway tag : with the key highway:legal_type, values : business_area
>>> or residential_area or an other local legal classification. A
>>> highway=tertiary could also be highway:legal_type=residential_area
>> This seems like it would be way less complicated and way easier to
>> troubleshoot and way easier to approach when you're new to the project to
>> just use source:maxspeed=* to explain the context.
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging