[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose

John Willis johnw at mac.com
Sat Sep 22 21:05:59 UTC 2018

> On Sep 22, 2018, at 11:03 PM, Daniele Santini <danysan95 at gmail.com> wrote:
> edit the proposal substituting the old tag and values with the new tags or create a new proposal with the new tags?

If you feel the original proposal (or the discussion around it) is valuable, start a new one. If it is of minor or no importance, just rewrite the existing page. You can note "originally started as assembly_point:purpose=tsunami, etc.,  "

Under "rationale", you can use it as an example where assigning a single value is not flexible enough to accurately tag the multi-use nature of most assembly_points. 

This will also document the originally proposed tag's role in refining the currently proposed one, and show up in OSM searches without leading to a dead proposal page. 


More information about the Tagging mailing list