[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose

Daniele Santini danysan95 at gmail.com
Sun Sep 23 12:14:06 UTC 2018


Ok, I updated the existing proposal (the link is the same,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/assembly_point:purpose
) moving from assembly_point:purpose=<EMERGENCY_TYPE> to
assembly_point:<EMERGENCY_TYPE>=* .

Cheers,
Daniele


Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 06:05:59 +0900
> From: John Willis <johnw at mac.com>
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>         <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose
> Message-ID: <39497331-D154-430F-85DF-F4713C678F97 at mac.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>
> > On Sep 22, 2018, at 11:03 PM, Daniele Santini <danysan95 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > edit the proposal substituting the old tag and values with the new tags
> or create a new proposal with the new tags?
>
> If you feel the original proposal (or the discussion around it) is
> valuable, start a new one. If it is of minor or no importance, just rewrite
> the existing page. You can note "originally started as
> assembly_point:purpose=tsunami, etc.,  "
>
> Under "rationale", you can use it as an example where assigning a single
> value is not flexible enough to accurately tag the multi-use nature of most
> assembly_points.
>
> This will also document the originally proposed tag's role in refining the
> currently proposed one, and show up in OSM searches without leading to a
> dead proposal page.
>
> Javbw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180923/002f9588/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list