[Tagging] RFC - landcover clearing

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Sep 26 15:46:11 UTC 2018




22. Sep 2018 10:16 by 61sundowner at gmail.com <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>:


>         > On 22/09/18 17:39, Mateusz Konieczny      wrote:
>     >     
>>             
>>       22. Sep 2018 00:38 by >> 61sundowner at gmail.com <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>> :
>>       
>>       
>>>         >>> On 21/09/18 23:16, Mateusz          Konieczny wrote:
>>>         >>>         
>>>>           >>>> I am not sure why landcover=clearing is described as            better than other.>>>>           
>>>>           >>>>           >>>> If someone wants to leave gixme, the fixme key or OSM            note is the best solution. 
>>>>           >>>>         
>>>         
>>>         Best solution for what?
>>>       
>>       
>>
>>       
>>       
>> For marking clearing to be mapped. Obviously, mapping it        properly
>>       
>> would be better. But fixme/notes at least in theory can be        processed by other mappers,
>>       
>> in case of clearings - also by armchair mappers.
>>     
>     
>     But then the feature is harder to find in the data base. 
>     Note that clearings have already been marked as landuse=clearing. 
>




I am not sure why you believe that tagging TODO item as landcover tag rather than established

fixme key is preferable.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180926/e711c047/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list