[Tagging] Tagging a named river bend

Yves yvecai at mailbox.org
Thu Sep 27 15:03:38 UTC 2018


Section_name, is there not something like this in the whitewater tagging scheme?
Yep: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:whitewater:section_name&action=edit&redlink=1

And yes, this tagging scheme extend to brown/blue/green river sections.
Yves 

Le 27 septembre 2018 16:14:47 GMT+02:00, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>
>sent from a phone
>
>> On 27. Sep 2018, at 15:57, Dave Swarthout <daveswarthout at gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> 
>> This bend may or may not lend its name to a locality but it is
>primarily a feature of the river, not the name of a settled place.
>
>
>locality is explicitly for toponyms that don’t refer to settlements or
>their parts. I agree that a node is not nice, because we might want to
>tag sections of a river that are quite long, and a node doesn’t express
>this.
>
>Another idea would be to use additionally a subtag on the part, e.g.
>section_name=*
>
>Cheers,
>Martin
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180927/89d6e1a7/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list