[Tagging] mast / tower / communication_tower (again)

SelfishSeahorse selfishseahorse at gmail.com
Sun Sep 30 15:24:47 UTC 2018

On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 14:45, Martin Koppenhoefer
<dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> > To solve the contradiction we need to get rid of one of the two definitions.
> they could be combined: if it is intended to be accessed by people (not only for maintenance) and is not guyed it is a tower, otherwise it would be a mast.

I think it's better to stick to either a common or a technical
definition. OSM-specific definitions are prone to create confusion and
tagging mistakes.

More information about the Tagging mailing list