[Tagging] mast / tower / communication_tower (again)
selfishseahorse at gmail.com
Sun Sep 30 16:03:21 UTC 2018
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 17:24, SelfishSeahorse <selfishseahorse at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 14:45, Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > To solve the contradiction we need to get rid of one of the two definitions.
> > they could be combined: if it is intended to be accessed by people (not only for maintenance) and is not guyed it is a tower, otherwise it would be a mast.
> I think it's better to stick to either a common or a technical
> definition. OSM-specific definitions are prone to create confusion and
> tagging mistakes.
PS: Except if this appears to be a common definition.
More information about the Tagging