[Tagging] amenity=place_of_worship | Re: Mapping of indigenous sacred / ceremonial sites

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Apr 3 19:24:44 UTC 2019

Apr 3, 2019, 8:34 PM by pla16021 at gmail.com:

> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 18:29, Topographe Fou <> letopographefou at gmail.com <mailto:letopographefou at gmail.com>> > wrote:
>> Access=adherents is a non-sens. You don't have to be a customer to enter a shop (you may become one, but only after you entered), same for most of the places of worship when you are not an "adherent" (which by the way is hard to prove/unprove in most cases).
> However, the same is not true of ALL places of worship.  There are some denominations of
> some religions where non-believers are not permitted to enter places of worship.  The penalties
> for failing to observe that prohibition can be severe.  Do you really wish somebody to get stoned
> to death for entering a place of worship because OSM stated that access was open to all?
That is quite poor argument, someone believing map data so blindly would be dead soon 

Though this information is worth tagging.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190403/3dc1c3b0/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list