[Tagging] What is the role of "role=guidepost"

Peter Elderson pelderson at gmail.com
Sat Apr 13 22:37:42 UTC 2019


Loose guidepost nodes are a nuisance when processing route relations by
hand or by software. On the other hand, you might argue that most routes
are nothing else than imaginary lines between guideposts.

But I would say, practically, guideposts do not need to be in the route
relation. If a guidepost is part of a route, it is also part of a way so
the point location is already in there. No need to add it again. You could
simply take an existing node or add one on the existing way, add some tags
to it, if you want to enable special rendering or processing. If it's not
on a way, it's also not part of a route. It just happens to be near.

Vr gr Peter Elderson


Op za 13 apr. 2019 om 20:52 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdreist at gmail.com>:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 13. Apr 2019, at 12:06, Volker Schmidt <voschix at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > But your example is different. You put the function into the name field.
> For me the role of an object tagged information=guidepost is exactly that,
> a guidepost.  I am sure I am missing something, otherwise it would not have
> 50k uses.
>
>
> I guess people are putting the guideposts into the relations because they
> feel they belong to the route, and they add the role so it becomes evident
> in the relation editor why there are node members.
> It doesn’t seem to create problems, but it also doesn’t seem to add
> anything (provided there would not be objects acting as guideposts that
> aren’t guideposts)
>
>
> Cheers, Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190414/a41785a7/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list