[Tagging] Subtag for place=locality?
daveswarthout at gmail.com
Tue Apr 16 18:56:42 UTC 2019
I also disagree. The discussion on this list about how to map groups of
lakes that share one overall name resulted in my use of type=group to
describe them. If I'm restricted to using the group relation for nodes
only, I'm back to square one. I might just as well use a multipolygon
relation for them as I have in the past.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:21 AM Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:00 PM Joseph Eisenberg <
> joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I added some comments to the talk page of your "type=group" relation
>> I would recommend simplifying the proposal to just be for groups of
>> nodes, because there are already relations for multipolygons (areas)
> I disagree. I think a group of areas is semantically different from a
> multipolygon. If I will relate this to GeoJSON concepts, the first is like
> a GeoJSON FeatureCollection where individual Features are
> Polygons/MultiPolygons, while the second is just a GeoJSON MultiPolygon.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging