[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Baby changing table

[Michael Brandtner]

I don' think we should use no, but private. But as others have stated, I can't really think of a changing table that should be mapped in osm but isn't accessible even for customers. 
But us this really a point we need to discuss? Can't we just say that changing_table:access should be used with values of the access key and let mappers decide which one is the most apptopiate? 
 
  Am Mo., Apr. 22, 2019 at 14:46 schrieb Valor Naram<valinora at gmx.net>:   _______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190422/1361cf76/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Untitled
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190422/1361cf76/attachment-0001.ksh>