[Tagging] Status of oneway=cw oneway=ccw
s8evq at runbox.com
Tue Apr 30 18:18:35 UTC 2019
Helo everyone. I would like to pick up this month old discussion again and try to come to a conclussion.
The situation so far:
Problem: There are signposted hiking and biking routes, where the route itself goes only one way, because it's not way-marked in the opposite direction. How do we add that information in OSM?
Current solution: oneway=yes. Not preferred by many on this list, as oneway should indicate a legal restriction.
New solution: Some of you suggested alternative new tags, but we didn't come to a conclusion on this yet. What I have gathered from the various answers:
Personally, I like signed_direction=yes. It's simple and avoids using the word oneway.
Also, using the value forward|backward might not be necessary, as it's possible to deduce this from the order of ways in the relation.
Any other views? Anybody against replacing oneway=yes with signed_direction=yes in the wiki pages of route=foot and route=hiking?
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:37:35 +0000, marc marc <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Le 19.03.19 à 10:05, marc marc a écrit :
> > Le 19.03.19 à 09:37, Markus a écrit :
> >> what about signed_direction=*?
> > signed:forward|backward|both|none ?
> oups typo
> signed=forward|backward|both|none ?
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Tagging