[Tagging] Use of a site relation for grouping parking spaces

Jez Nicholson jez.nicholson at gmail.com
Wed Dec 4 07:43:09 UTC 2019


Alessandro: good work!

Andy T.: site relations are used for onshore wind farms as the 'farm' is
the collection of turbines and not the areas in-between which are still
used for farming, etc. It _might_ apply to a solar farm where fields of
panels are not contiguous, but generally we have used a site boundary
polygon for a security fence.

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:58 PM Alessandro Sarretta <
alessandro.sarretta at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank to everybody, the text has been changed (by Mateusz Konieczny)
> accordingly:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space&diff=1928515&oldid=1890083
>
> Ale
>
> On 03/12/19 23:42, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >
> > sent from a phone
> >
> >> On 3. Dec 2019, at 20:32, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I doubt it is useful to use a type=site relation with parking_space
> features at all. But your proposed rewording would be an improvement.
> >
> > I mostly agree, although one could construct situations where you might
> want to relate e.g. parking ticket machines or surveillance cameras
> (located outside the parking and represented by nodes) to specific
> parkings. Generally it doesn’t seem helpful to require a site relation, in
> most cases it wouldn’t add anything.
> >
> > Cheers Martin
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20191204/3654115f/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list