[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - park_drive

Martin Scholtes mail at martin-scholtes.de
Sat Dec 7 23:54:04 UTC 2019


Am 07.12.2019 um 19:44 schrieb Philip Barnes:
> On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 14:46 +0100, Martin Scholtes wrote:
>> Am 05.12.2019 um 12:41 schrieb Sören Reinecke via Tagging:
>>
>>> Allows the tag the mapping of carpool meeting points?
>> The proposal aims at marking parking places where one could meet to
>> carpool or which explicitly provide for parking one's vehicle and
>> forming a carpool.
>>
>> An example would be a car park at a railway station, where you could
>> meet and carpool, but the car park is not explicitly intended for
>> this
>> purpose, but for travelling by public transport.
> In that case you could very easily be in breach of the terms of use of
> that car park. Occasional use may go unnoticed but one a public
> database encourages such use then action could happen.
>
> This type of tagging should only apply to officially designated places.
>
> I have local knowledge of changes to parking conditions resulting in
> changes to the conditions of use aimed at preventing such usage.
>
It may be that the person in question is using the parking lot contrary
to the service, but this is less noticeable on site.

In my opinion it should not be given for such a case, because =no is
standard.

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen


Martin Scholtes


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3935 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20191208/5569ce42/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the Tagging mailing list