[Tagging] Route node roles - was Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles
Peter Elderson
pelderson at gmail.com
Sun Dec 8 23:44:21 UTC 2019
Ok, just asking to make sure.
Could you envision a node passed by two hikes, and being a checkpoint for
the one and nothing special for the other?
Would a checkpoint need to be a node of a way in the relation?
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op ma 9 dec. 2019 om 00:16 schreef Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 6:10 PM Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is a checkpoint a feature in itself?
>
> Of course it is. A way segment is also a feature in itself, which
> doesn't mean that it can't or shouldn't be part of a route relation:
> "When you're hiking this route, you'll need to sign in at these
> points."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20191209/760a19ba/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list