[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - park_drive

[Warin]

On 09/12/19 10:12, Martin Scholtes wrote:
> Am 08.12.2019 um 05:04 schrieb Alessandro Sarretta:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> my doubt on your proposal is that I think the only useful value would
>> be "designated" (anyway, can you share any example/picture of a sign
>> describing a park specificly designated for carpooling?). But in this
>> case I'd support
>>
> you can have a look at a sign for such a parking lot which is explicitly
> built and maintained for carpooling under the following link:
> https://mitfahren.rlp.de/fileadmin/_processed_/2/3/csm_Mitfahrerparkplatz_LBM_3_2_b8add83c7b.jpg
>
>> As far as I know, in a general-use parking (without specific access
>> conditions) anyone can park, meet with a friend, and then continue the
>> journey with only one car... What is the purpose to explicitly add
>> this information?
>>
> Parking spaces that have been explicitly created for car pools are built
> and maintained by the state. Furthermore, this type of car park does not
> exist everywhere, mostly only at points where many commuters meet. It
> makes the search easier. Because at the moment such objects can only be
> found by a possible name, for example "Mitfahrerparkplatz".
>
>

As far as I can see those parking places are available for all to use.

So tag as;

amenity=parking

carpool_parking=yes ??


The name is not Mitfahrerparkplatz, at best that is a description. We don't use name=parkplatz ?