[Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 113, Issue 51 Re: tree rows vs individual trees

[St Niklaas]

Hi
Just an addition to Peters lines, follow the link,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/52.6446/5.6931
Each row is invalid marked as managed forest, yes the row is managed but just for residential use. Almost every farmyard has been surrounded by one or more rows of trees in this barren flat country.
I would not avoid the mapping of single trees, dont do it if you dont want it, but in reality the singel tree option gives this country just its own caracteristics. The tree rows are mostly used by easy goiing mappers. As Peter stated there are a lot of rows to map like these fields, use this link for excample.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.636612998627385&lng=5.7831217612532555&z=20&pKey=bxufKHlJCt8k1sGQzlV6BA

Greetz

[https://images.mapillary.com/bxufKHlJCt8k1sGQzlV6BA/thumb-640.jpg]<https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.636612998627385&lng=5.7831217612532555&z=20&pKey=bxufKHlJCt8k1sGQzlV6BA>

Netherlands, image by commodoortje<https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.636612998627385&lng=5.7831217612532555&z=20&pKey=bxufKHlJCt8k1sGQzlV6BA>
Map data at scale from street-level imagery
www.mapillary.com


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190212/36497df5/attachment.html>