[Tagging] StreetComplete 10 / foot=yes on residential

[Tobias Zwick]

I don't take dismissive and generalizing statements on a project I have
been putting 3+ years of lifeblood into, invest much of my free time in
and offer as open source for the betterment of OSM, lightly.

If you have a concrete constructive suggestion to make, do it,
otherwise, save your breath.

Tobias

On 14/02/2019 11:45, Wiklund Johan wrote:
> I think that apps adding redundant tags to cover for a tiny number of special cases is going to cause more problems than it solves (i.e. users misinterpreting the question and adding "private" access to all kinds of roads). StreetBloat instead of StreetComplete :)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com] 
> Sent: torsdag 14. februar 2019 10.36
> To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] StreetComplete 10 / foot=yes on residential
> 
> 
> 
> sent from a phone
> 
>> On 14. Feb 2019, at 10:26, Florian Lohoff <f at zz.de> wrote:
>>
>> All residentials are accessible to pedestrians so i a bit puzzled what 
>> this challenge is good for. It just adds redundant tags to all roads.
> 
> 
> I agree the default is accessibility for everyone on non-motorroad roads. There might be residential roads with private access (in the occasions I met where access was private I was tending towards service, although with general public access I would have called them residentials).
> 
> Cheers, Martin 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>