[Tagging] Public Transport Timetables Proposal RFC

[Jo]

I think most people will be against having variable roles in the route
relations.

Polyglot

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 8:04 PM santamariense <imagens.sm at gmail.com> wrote:

> > I also created a proposal, but I knew in advance it wouldn't be practical
> > to duplicate full GTFS functionality in OSM.
>
> Well, this is not a so simple question. There're many countries around
> the world that have no GTFS. And, it's just what happens to us in
> Brazil. We are mapping intercity bus routes in the state where I live.
> So, if we have this data in OSM, maybe we are going to be the pioneer.
>
> Do not map GTFS in OSM for me sounds like do not map building in city
> X because it's available in town hall.
>
> >
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_transport_timetables
>
> I didn't follow the discussion but this proposal is at least helpfull.
> Why do not map xx:xx in the same route relation? Role examples:
> stop at 00:20, stop_exit_only at 03:45, stop_entry_only at 00:25-00:31, and for
> bus stops where the timetable is approximated (like in Brazil) use "~"
> for the usual times, examples: stop@~00:27-00:30,
> stop_exit_only@~00:46
>
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport_agencies
>
> It has gone to my wiki watchlist so I can follow it in its developing.
>
> >
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_transport_schedules/Departures
>
> This proposal is as simple as possible and it's better to be so.
> However it doesn't cover all situations. For example, stops that have
> checkpoint, in another words, that have exact time to arrive and/or
> leave intermediaries stops. Many times only duration=* cannot be
> enough to accurate times in intermediaries stops.
>
> LeifRasmussen, what do you think about to attach "duration in roles"
> to complement the proposal? It is supposed to be used not in all
> stops, but only in those that have exact time to arrive/leave, or at
> least a well known usual time.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190215/3f6e5f60/attachment.html>