[Tagging] start_date variants

[Anton Klim]

Like in the thread opening email, where there is an amenity that occupies the whole building, we put amenity tags on the outline. 
I generally support adding more granularity to start_date, but feel like start_date:* might fit better than *:start_date. 

Anton Klim

> 16 февр. 2019 г., в 21:40, Sergio Manzi <smz at smz.it> написал(а):
> 
> Stephan, can you point to any such object in OSM where you find that ambiguity?
> 
> I have the feeling that we could possibly discover a violation of the "One feature, one OSM element" principle [1] in there...
> 
> Sergio
> 
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
> 
> 
>> On 2019-02-16 22:01, Stephan Bösch-Plepelits wrote:
>> My suggestion was to use a prefix "building:" if the start_date of the
>> building differs from the start_date of the amenity. It is not very common
>> though right now, with only 163 uses. Only 9 have both start_date and
>> building:start_date.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging